Euler and #PythaShastri

First things first. Most of basic feelings of mathematicians are basic.
Euler talked on primes.
#PythaShastri had vision of measuring behaviour.
Euler was able to utilise primes in numbers in 3 ways. 2 for pi and 1 for Riemann zeta functions. For pi one method was - and + of primes in 1/n Riemann zeta functions.  1 point. Another was as products of primes and divided by nearest multiple of 4s. 1 point. Also he talked of 1/1- (1/P(k)). 1 point. 3 points.
#PythaShastri was able to utilise primes in 1 way. Decimal point. A sort of Riemann zeta functions. 1 point.
Euler gets  3 points and #PythaShastri 1 point.
Euler knew and expressed gamma. 1 point.
So Euler gets 4 points and #PythaShastri 1 point.
#PythaShastri did pi with own methods. 1 point.
Euler 4 points and #PythaShastri 2 points.
Differential are west-tech. They are events. Constant e.
Euler was greatest. I am reasonably ok as events methods usage.
No points to me here in differential, integral or logarithmic.
#PythaShastri has primes and combinations advantage courtesy measuring behaviour.
#PythaShastri can work on Ramanujan and Chudnovsky pi functions.
If at all I take chances. Or get a chance.
This finishes the topic.